Let me get this last post on The Crown out of the way – I like to complete things! It now strikes me as odd that I’ve spent the most time writing about the season I liked the least! Oh, well …. Maybe in preparation for season 5 I’ll rewatch and add more about the other seasons. Anyway – here is the last of my season 3 thoughts.
The Dangling Man – focuses on David and Charles, as David is dying and Charles is looking for someone to validate his desire to be with the woman he loves, a.k.a. Camilla. I don’t have a problem with David once again talking about marrying his great love or even a young Charles looking to justify his joy at finding someone he loves. My problems with this episode are that it seems like they overstated the love story and forgot the scheming nature of David and Wallis, whether engaging with the Nazis or trying to make money. The show perpetuated the story that this was a romantic relationship for the ages, when really he was much more into her than she was into him. My biggest problem with the show’s presentation was that they changed actors for David and Wallis. I know this was part of the show’s gimmick … er … artistic choice to avoid having to age the actors. The problem here is that it didn’t feel to me like the David and Wallis I knew from seasons 1 and 2 – these were strangers. Alex Jennings and Lia Williams did such a great job in seasons 1 and 2 and that continuity would have would have made David’s death more impactful. Surely, they could have slapped on some make-up for one episode.
Imbroglio – focuses on Camilla and Charles and their complicated situation. I’ll admit that I’ve always had some sympathy for Charles in that he truly loved Camilla (probably more than she loved him, so there’s a parallel with David) and was not able to marry her at that time. Not to fear, I also have sympathy for Diana, especially in the early years of her marriage, but they were such a bad match and brought out the worst in each other. This episode shows why a Charles and Camilla match is better for Charles than a Charles and Diana match. This is another episode where the script deviated from reality in having Mountbatten and the Queen Mother intervene – finding ways to include the actors, perhaps?
Cri de Coeur – focuses on Margaret and this episode is excellent. Poor Margaret. On one hand, she is a wealthy and well-known woman who could have found a way to make a more substantial contribution to the world but was just too “entitled”. On the other hand, her family siding with her cheating and cruel husband at her birthday dinner was devastating. Did that really happen? Who knows, but she really was slammed by challenging relationship issues. So glad that she had some happiness with Roddy Llewellyn (and again the show misrepresented the timeline), but sadly that came crashing down. The suicide attempt was just so sad, but great acting by both Helena Bonham Carter and Olivia Coleman. A a jubilee that seemed anything but jubilant.
My previous post made it seem like I dislike The Crown (or at least season 3), but it is still a good show
So, what was good about season 3 of The Crown? There were several really good episodes.
I’ll make a blanket statement that I wish they had left the season 1 & 2 cast in place through the 1966 episode and added at least two of the first three episodes to season 2. QEII was about 38 years old in 1964 (end of season 2/beginning of season 3) and 43 in 1969 (starting at season 3, episode 4). Clair Foy was about 35 years old in 2019 when the season was shot and Olivia Coleman was about 45.
So, I’m back again! It’s been an interesting year. More of that to come in future posts.
I started this post months ago, shortly after I finished season 3 of The Crown. It was an interesting season in that there were some parts that were very intense and other parts that were, dare I say, a little boring. If seasons 1 and 2 were more uniformly good, IMO, season 3 was a bit of a mixed bag. Mom and I are starting the series again, so may have more comments on seasons 1-3. I’m also watching season 4 with friends. It will be a bit of a smattering of thoughts, I’m afraid!
Following up on my post about The Crown, Mom and I have watched the first two seasons and started season 3. For her, season 3 is a bit easier to follow – they are more like stand-alone episodes so she doesn’t have to remember a story arc. I have mixed feelings about season 3 … for the same reason. Continue reading →
I watched and loved House, the TV show with the wonderful Hugh Laurie playing the obnoxious Dr. Gregory House. Or at least I loved the first, maybe, five seasons – it went off the rails for me at some point around season six.
As crazy as some of the plots and relationships were on House, my biggest surprise with the series is that my mother actually enjoyed it! Granted, we didn’t watch many episodes and they were all season one – I think The Crown, season 2 became available and we switched to that. Continue reading →
Father Brown and Agatha Christie’s Poirot are two of our favorite shows. It’s not surprising, as both showcase smart and amusing fellows who just happen to find a lot of dead bodies. At first, Mom was skeptical – she was not a mystery buff, after all. Continue reading →
It’s hard to find comedies that engage my mother. Her sense of humor has changed over the years. She doesn’t stay current with pop culture, so does not always understand the references in current shows. There are two programs that always manage to make her laugh and that we have watched over and over again: The Golden Girls and Keeping Up Appearances. Continue reading →
My mother and I are not really into football and only tune in occasionally. Although we didn’t watch the Super Bowl, we did watch the Puppy Bowl and the Kitten Bowl – boatloads of cuteness. Continue reading →